The X post makes two distinct assertions: that morning erections are among the most direct hormone-level indicators doctors rely on, and that they occur almost daily. Medical sources broadly confirm a link between nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) and testosterone, but they consistently describe the relationship in more cautious terms than the post does.
Hone Health's reporting, drawing on urologists Andrew Sun and Scott Miller, states that regular morning erections suggest adequate testosterone and good penile health, but explicitly warns that the absence of morning erections does not necessarily mean low testosterone. Sun is quoted as saying that libido is "probably a pretty good indicator of testosterone for most people," which undercuts the post's claim that morning erections are among the most direct indicators. The same article notes that erection quality depends on vascular, neurologic, and hormonal factors combined — not hormones alone.
The Wikipedia entry on nocturnal penile tumescence explains that NPT testing is used clinically to distinguish psychological from physiological erectile dysfunction, not primarily as a hormone-level assessment tool. The cause of NPT is described as not fully understood, with Bancroft's hypothesis pointing to testosterone-related excitatory actions during REM sleep. This supports a hormonal connection but does not elevate morning erections to the status of a primary diagnostic tool for hormone levels — blood tests fill that role.
WebMD's overview echoes the same picture: morning erections can be a sign of healthy testosterone, but the article emphasizes that other health conditions can also produce or suppress them. Strut Health's blog is even more direct, stating that "morning wood does not equate high testosterone" and that regular morning wood more accurately reflects normal, balanced hormone levels rather than elevated ones.
On frequency, the sources note that men typically experience three to five erections per night, with the final one often persisting into morning — supporting the "almost every day" framing for younger, healthy men. However, Hone Health cites research showing a significant drop-off after age 50, and WebMD notes erections become less frequent and softer with age. So the daily-frequency claim is age-dependent and not universal.
Taken together, the underlying biology in the post is real, but the framing inflates the clinical importance of morning erections as a hormone diagnostic. The claim is mostly accurate in spirit but overstated in specifics.