← Back to archive How it works

Published fact-check

Hungarian Constitutional Amendment Procedures and the 'Constituent Assembly' Claim

Claim checked

“Changing the constitution would only be possible if the Tisza Party, using its two-thirds majority, called a Constituent National Assembly, after which parliament would dissolve itself. If it does not choose this path, it would essentially amount to a constitutional coup.”

Published April 15, 2026 at 3:39 PM

Verdict

Misleading

The claim that changing the Hungarian constitution is only possible through a 'Constituent National Assembly' followed by the dissolution of parliament is legally incorrect under the current Fundamental Law of Hungary. While a political actor may propose such a path as a moral or democratic preference, the existing legal framework provides a specific, legal mechanism for amendments that does not require a separate assembly or immediate dissolution.

5 reviewed sources behind this verdict.

Reasoning

Under the Fundamental Law of Hungary (the constitution), the National Assembly (Parliament) holds the power to adopt and amend the constitution directly. According to Article S, an amendment requires the support of two-thirds of the votes of all Members of the National Assembly.

There is no legal requirement in the current constitution for a 'Constituent National Assembly' or for the parliament to dissolve itself following an amendment. The claim characterizes the use of the existing two-thirds majority process as a 'constitutional coup,' but this process is the standard legal procedure established by the 2011 Fundamental Law. The assertion that a separate assembly is the 'only' possible way to change the constitution is a political argument rather than a statement of current Hungarian constitutional law.

Source quality: The Fundamental Law of Hungary (Source 9, 12, 14) clearly outlines the amendment process, which contradicts the claim that a separate assembly is the only legal path.

Key checks

  • Constitutional Amendment Procedure: The Fundamental Law of Hungary (2011) specifies that the National Assembly may amend the constitution with a two-thirds majority of its members. It does not mandate a separate 'Constituent Assembly.'

  • Dissolution of Parliament: The constitution allows the President to dissolve parliament under specific conditions (e.g., failure to approve a budget), but there is no requirement for parliament to dissolve itself simply because it amended the constitution.

  • 2026 Election Context: Reports indicate the Tisza Party won a two-thirds majority (138 of 199 seats) in the April 2026 elections, giving them the legal threshold required for constitutional changes under current law.

Confidence

High